Can Natural Gas Replace Coal?


| March-April 2010


The discovery of a gigantic natural gas deposit under the eastern United States has energy watchers discussing what it means for the power mix. Technology Review (Nov.-Dec. 2009) reports that the gas-rich Marcellus shale layer could supply enough natural gas for the country for 90 years at current consumption rates, or 50 years even if we used it to totally replace coal. That’s welcome news for the green movement, given that natural gas burns cleaner, producing less carbon dioxide.

Kicking our coal habit won’t be easy, of course. The lumpy black stuff is cheaper than natural gas, making it more attractive to power producers. Detroit still isn’t making cars and trucks that run on natural gas and, even if they did, there’s no refueling infrastructure in place. Finally, federal energy policy, which erroneously considers natural gas a “declining resource,” offers few incentives to increase use of the fuel.

The ground is shifting, though. As Congress debates new energy policies, there will no doubt be conversations about a cap and trade on carbon emissions that would drive utilities toward natural gas, as well as requirements that it be part of a utility’s energy mix. “I don’t think natural gas is an alternative to renewables,” Stanford geophysics professor Mark Zoback tells Technology Review, “but I do think it is by far the best fuel to use as we transition away from fossil fuels.”

The United States should take a cue from Asia-Pacific countries, where natural-gas vehicles are prevalent. Many of them have already been converted from gasoline, and Technology Review reports that the Colorado-based nonprofit Envirofit has developed a fuel-injection kit that increases efficiency and decreases emissions. Owners can buy the $300 setup with microloans, and by saving fuel it pays for itself in six months.



Joyce_2
5/12/2010 7:49:43 AM

What is the point of discussing automobiles in a discussion about coal vs natural gas? As far as I know Detroit hasn't built coal burning cars either. Natural Gas vehicles do exist in fleet vehicles for UPS and some municipalities.


Doug Lass_4
4/15/2010 11:27:41 AM

Why not tap the nations sewage treatment plants? I know it probably won't provide all the natural gas needed, but if you consider using grass clippings and leaves among other things that would be put through methane digesters it could provide some of the natural gas needs of the country.


Joyce_2
4/15/2010 8:28:32 AM

Another question is to the idea that Fossil Gas has a smaller carbon foot print than coal. There is considerable information to show that once you take into account the carbon emitted in the process of obtaining the gas, it is NOT a cleaner fuel. This process requires extensive truck traffic to bring in the toxic chemicals and to transport the MILLIONS of gallons of water used in the fracking process. There are also diesel powered compressor stations that run 24/7 to power the activities at the drill pad. Escaping gas from the well adds methane to the atmosphere which is a potent greenhouse gas. It's time to stop wasting our time on dirty technologies.















Pay Now Save $5!

Utne Summer 2016Want to gain a fresh perspective? Read stories that matter? Feel optimistic about the future? It's all here! Utne Reader offers provocative writing from diverse perspectives, insightful analysis of art and media, down-to-earth news and in-depth coverage of eye-opening issues that affect your life.

Save Even More Money By Paying NOW!

Pay now with a credit card and take advantage of our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You save an additional $5 and get 4 issues of Utne Reader for only $40.00 (USA only).

Or Bill Me Later and pay just $45 for 4 issues of Utne Reader!




Facebook Instagram Twitter flipboard


Copyright 2018, All Rights Reserved
Ogden Publications, Inc., 1503 SW 42nd St., Topeka, Kansas 66609-1265