Canada’s Shameful Environmental Record


Canadian tar sands protester 

As I read OnEarth magazine’s no-holds-barred story condemning Canada’s past and present environmental record—billed on the cover as “Blame Canada: Our Rapacious Neighbor to the North”—I thought, wow, Canadians are going to be mad at the American who wrote this. Then I realized that the author, Andrew Nikiforuk, is a Canadian himself, and so are many of the harshest critics quoted in the piece.  

Which makes the story a particularly tough pill to swallow for any Canadian who still harbors the illusion that his or her country is a beacon of environmental enlightenment. Sure, Canada has sensible gun laws, universal health care, gay marriage, and a refreshing lack of religious fanaticism—but, writes Nikiforuk:  

Although Canada pretends to be a Jolly Green Giant, it is actually a resource-exploiting Jekyll and Hyde. Whenever global demand for metals and minerals booms, Canada takes on a sinister personality. And whenever export markets shrivel, the country temporarily retreats into a kindly figure with memory of the misdeeds of his alter ego. But for most of Canada’s history, the nasty Mr. Hyde has dominated the nation’s economic life as a hewer of wood, a netter of fish, a dammer of rivers, and a miner of metals.  

Well, then. Canada’s current earthly plunder is of course the tar sands of Alberta, but Nikiforuk makes the convincing case that this is just the latest in a long line of environmental transgressions, tempered by a brief spell of admirable anti-climate-change moves, as one expert tells him:  

“Canada used to be a leader in climate-change policy and action,” says Andrew Weaver of the University of Victoria, one of Canada’s leading climate-change researchers. But that was before it became America’s number-one oil supplier. Now, Weaver says, “Canada has an ideological agenda all built around the export of one resource.”  

Furthermore, it would be bad enough if Canada were simply destroying its own environment, but the country’s reach extends far beyond its borders thanks to the global nature of 21st century extraction industries, Nikiforuk points out:  

When not digging up their own backyard, Canada’s energetic engineers and drillers are busy abroad, with almost half their investments concentrated in Mexico, Chile, and the United States.  

It’s easy to take this blame game too far; we Americans are of course culpable in any environmental destruction committed to feed our insatiable needs for energy, food, and products. But perhaps it is time to see Canada in a more nuanced light.  

One U.S. green activist, writes Nikiforuk, “ had a benign view of Canada as a forested country with funky rock bands such as the Barenaked Ladies.” This is much too narrow a view; to be fair, she should have remembered that along with Neil Young and Arcade Fire, Canada has also given us Celine Dion and Nickelback.  

Source: OnEarth 

Image by jonathan mcintosh, licensed under Creative Commons. 

5/1/2012 4:30:10 PM

Let it be known to all Americans that Canada too has fallen prey to corporate interests. And it is not "Canada" that's at fault; it's the current Canadian government, the Conservative Party. They've just pulled the rug out of the environmental movement by cutting their funding, challenging their charitable status, and muzzling them from speaking out against the Enbridge Northern Pipeline project. Our progressive parties--the Green Party and the New Democrat Party are violently opposing these measures--but the Conservatives have a majority and pretty well do as they please. And just like the US, we have evidence of election fraud and corruption galore in the reigning government. My point: don’t blame “Canada” or “Canadians” any more than you’d blame “Americans” for the transgressions of the Repubic Pary. We are fighting the same erosion of democracy as Americans are. I wish Nikiforuk would make that more clear.

Drew Kerr
10/25/2011 5:00:34 PM

Canada's record on the Kyoto Protocol pretty much says it all. Only when green business becomes good business will there be a fundamental shift in corporate and state ethics. Consumers have to demand this change. It's increasingly evident that such leadership is not going to come from the top.

Facebook Instagram Twitter