Get the Koch Brothers Out of Your Gear


| 5/16/2011 4:20:40 PM



Pile of packs 

Would you want to go camping, hiking, biking, or trail running with the Koch brothers? Me neither. Well, then, why on earth would you want to do any of those things with the products they help make?

That’s the thorny question that may face many green-minded outdoor recreationists when it sinks in that a host of material brands used in their gear are controlled by the right-wing brothers David and Charles Koch, who have been widely outed as major funders of anti-environment politics and climate-change denial PR campaigns.

Like what materials, you ask?

Like the Polarguard insulation in your sleeping bag, the Coolmax fabric in your running outfit, the Lycra in your swimwear, the Supplex in your windbreaker, and—woe upon woe—the Cordura that’s ubiquitous in the gear world. I own duffels, backpacks, stuff sacks, fanny packs, bike bags, luggage, gaiters, and binocular cases made of the stuff.



Now, it’s no surprise to me that these materials are all made from petroleum, so I had an inkling they weren’t exactly the most sustainable products: Using “dinosaur squeezin’s” to make fabric and insulation is as problematic as using it to fuel our cars. But it pains me to think that the very gear that helps me journey out into inspirational natural settings is tainted because it’s part of a corporate machine that is quite literally and demonstrably destroying the very same natural world.

Beth Jensen
5/20/2011 1:34:37 PM

The outdoor industry has been among the first industries to recognize that greater transparency and collaboration toward environmental impact reduction is needed within the supply chain. In fact, the industry has been working since 2007 on developing a common language and methodology for assessing the environmental impacts of their products - throughout the full life cycle of a product. This work, called the Eco Index (www.ecoindexbeta.org), is completely open-source and available for anyone to view and use, and has been (and continues to be) developed collaboratively, pre-competitively, by nearly 200 outdoor industry companies throughout the world who recognize that the majority of the industry's environmental impacts are happening within the supply chain. The challenges presented by today's complex global economy are immense and solutions will not happen overnight, but the outdoor industry is showing real, authentic leadership - and is being recognized as a model for other industries - in addressing these challenges using a collaborative, scalable, open-source model. Beth Jensen, Outdoor Industry Association


John Peacock
5/20/2011 9:14:40 AM

You don't have to be so patronizing in your comment interrobang_3 - "It looks like you missed the point" - sensationalistic - instead, a simple "I believe you missed the point" - I was just pointing out that by saying that he feels better about having pre-Koch Cordura gear because of Koch's environmental record is completely missing the point of his actions since DuPont has a very spotty environmental record itself. From an environmental angle, one is as bad as the other, ownership-boycott aside. If the point you WERE making was that you wanted to boycott anything Koch-owned, then yes, it makes sense to use DuPont made Cordura, regardless of buying new or not. Doesn't have a thing to do with the materials used to make it, just the owners. As a gear dork, I think it's absolutely awesome that you have a pack that's still kicking it after 30 years. That shows it was well made and I hope it lasts a great deal longer. I ran across a guy who had a test made by The North Face that lasted 30 years, only to fail in some way and TNF replaced it at no cost (after 30 years!) - that's a testament to great gear. Many times, Cordura/GoreTex/Primaloft/eVent/etc make that durability happen. Boycotting aside, I wouldn't want to be caught on day 6 of the Patagonian Expedition Race that we send a team to without the proper equipment that many of these technologies provide. http://gearjunkie.com/patagonian-race


interrobang_3
5/20/2011 8:41:38 AM

John, It looks like you missed the point. Koch Industries appear to be -paradoxically, in context of this article - anti-environment. It's not about what any other individual or entity did before, it's about now. About Koch Industries and the tendrils worming their way into every aspect of our lives, and specifically, outdoor gear. It's about those who love the environment being cognizant, and making decisions based on knowledge. Knowledge is power. Full Disclosure: NOT being a GearDork (I've never even heard of your .com), I'm happy to continue to use the same Jansport D3 I've owned for 30 years. Yep, it's Cordura spawned fresh from DuPont's bubbling womb, but I'm using it up, not buying new. Remember kids, reuse is better than recycling. Perhaps the best thing for the environment would be to simply leave it alone.