Give Up Hope for the Environment


| 4/8/2009 12:40:35 PM


Tags: Environment, Spirituality, hope, global warming,

Give Up Hope for the EnvironmentGlobal warming, massive species extinctions, pollution, and myriad other looming environmental catastrophes continue to threaten the planet, while environmentalists insist on preaching a gospel of hope. There’s an inherent contradiction in the hopeful environmental message, Michael Nelson and John Vucetich write for the Ecologist. They point out that films like An Inconvenient Truth and other environmental motivators often boil down to: 

1) Scientists give good reasons to think profound environmental disaster is eminent
2) It is urgent that you live up to a challengingly high standard—sustainability
And 3) the reason to live sustainably is that doing so gives hope for averting disaster.

The contradiction of asking people to be hopeful in a hopeless situation threatens to undermine the environmental movement. Instead, Nelson and Vucetich write that environmentalists should abandon hope and instead stress that sustainable living is the ethical and virtuous way to live. People shouldn’t hold out hope for a sustainable future that may never come. People should live sustainably because it’s the right thing to do.

“A wonderful thing happens when you give up on hope,” Derrick Jensen wrote for Orion in 2006, “which is that you realize you never needed it in the first place.” Hope implies powerlessness, a lack of agency, and a reliance on forces beyond your control. To focus on an abstract sustainable future neglects the real-world actions that can be taken right now. “When we realize the degree of agency we actually do have, we no longer have to ‘hope’ at all,” Jensen writes. “We simply do the work.”

Image by Brian Carlson, licensed under Creative Commons.



Sources: The Ecologist (article not available online), Orion

Lucy
4/12/2009 1:39:38 PM

If you are in the DC area April 25, be sure to go to see Derrick Jensen in person at Earth 911: A Wake-Up Call for Obama Nation. http://www.pressaction.com/news/weblog/earth911 Lucy


Katie_7
4/11/2009 11:25:49 PM

The Ecologist article by Nelson and Vucetich can be found here: http://news.msu.edu/media/documents/2009/02/6c612100-f233-4cb0-b2a3-6d03caa7741e.pdf


z. alexandra_1
4/10/2009 12:10:00 PM

when I worked for Greenpeace in the early 90s, running the Vancouver Island canvass and occasionally driving Zodiacs, we published a 3-fold pamphlet that had the headline, Hope For The Planet around that time someone published a catalog of environment challenges and the potential solutions for each one I started saying, except at the doors of course, that "the pamphlet (was) misleading, because there (was) no hope for the planet; we could save the planet, but there's no profit in it" I left Greenpeace less than a year after that today, we have many challenges that border on hopeless if they haven't already crossed that line, like the growing garbage-gyre in the Pacific Ocean