Islamic Militants Against Climate Change

| 12/22/2010 12:26:52 PM

Green Osama 

Many Republican politicians continue to cling to a science-defying denial of climate change. Meanwhile, writes Earth Island Journal, “Some of the most recognizable militants in the Islamic world … have recently made statements linking peace and stability with healthy ecosystems.”

We’re talking about people like Hezbollah guerilla leader Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah and terrorist majordomo Osama bin Laden. In October, writes Earth Island Journal, Nasrallah “took time out from his diatribes against the United States and Israel to deliver an environmentally themed stump speech.”

Reuters reported from the scene:

“The climate threat today,” the bespectacled cleric told his listeners, “is among the biggest threats faced by mankind in (terms of) its peace, security, stability and existence.”

Civic sense is not a strong point in Lebanon and it is not clear whether even Nasrallah can induce greener behavior on his compatriots, many of whom blithely toss litter from their cars.

But it was a striking theme for the leader of a militant Islamist armed movement, backed by Syria and Iran, and viewed by the United States as a terrorist organization.

Bin Laden, for his part, chimed in a week later, criticizing the official response to widespread flooding in Pakistan and linking the disaster to global warming. “The huge climate change is affecting our (Islamic) nation and is causing great catastrophes throughout the Islamic world,” bin Laden said, according to Reuters.

For greens trying to attract allies to their battle against climate change, these endorsements are a mixed blessing: On one hand, they signal a growing acceptance of current climate science even in unexpected quarters. On the other, do we want the wrong people on the right side of this issue? Doesn’t it make it a wee bit easier for climate-change deniers to paint greens as anti-American terrorist sympathizers?

1/1/2011 6:40:11 PM

I wish to affirm Lisa's observation about wrong people. As we saw out here in California during the Prop 23 battle, we have a greater chance of success w/ a very big tent. We would also benefit from acknowledging like Pogo that we have met the enemy, and s/he is us. Denigration/weakening of gov't is central to the neocon plan to allow greed and inequitity to run rampant. It's time to reclaim gov't (taxation, unions, etc.) as our bastions against environmental collapse.

12/29/2010 1:04:05 PM

There can not be any "wrong" people on the right side of this issue - not if those people share this planet. If anything, perhaps climate change can become the common enemy that finally unites more people in cooperating to find ways to live with its challenges. This is a pattern that's played out over and over in human history; it usually hasn't been love or tolerance or understanding but fear of a common threat and humanity's universal survival instinct which unifies people, at least as long as the common enemy exists. Of course, this requires that people acknowledge the existence of the threat. As long as our government is mired in its embarrassing backward stance toward climate change, we will continue to be out of synch with this possibility.

Facebook Instagram Twitter