Slow Consumption: Heirloom Design

Heirloom designers aim to change the world by making stuff that lasts


| March-April 2010



Slow Consumption

image by Jon Reinfurt / www.reinfurt.com

As the middle-class daughter of a refugee mother and a Depression-era father, I was part of a transitional generation of consumers. My parents could afford much more than they were willing to buy; most things that broke could be and were repaired. By the time my own children were born, America was flooded with cheap and cheaply made goods. So while my parents continued working at the sturdy antique desks they inherited from my grandparents and sleeping beneath a hand-crocheted bedspread, my children and their friends became the first and last owners of a seemingly endless supply of plastic toys and particleboard furniture.

These days, nearly everything is produced in China and made to be discarded. According to a 2008 report by the Economic Policy Institute, the United States imported $323 billion in Chinese goods in 2007, including $26.3 billion in apparel and accessories, $108.5 billion in computers and electronic products, and $15.3 billion in furniture and fixtures.

The manufacture, distribution, and disposal of an ever-growing mountain of short-lived consumer goods have taken an enormous environmental toll. We can’t, however, only blame the quantity and quality of Chinese goods for the consequences of this transoceanic factory-to-waste stream. For that we can blame the two horsemen of the modern consumer apocalypse: functional obsolescence and fashion obsolescence.

Functional, or planned, obsolescence is the intentional decision by designers and manufacturers to ensure that things don’t last, so that consumers must buy new ones. Fashion obsolescence is the related decision to offer new features and aesthetic changes to entice consumers to discard their old items in favor of updated and supposedly better ones.

Ironically, product obsolescence was once seen as the remedy for what ailed our country. Lizabeth Cohen, chair of the history department at Harvard University and author of A Consumers’ Republic: The Politics of Mass Consumption in Postwar America, traces the origins of mass consumption to the period immediately before and after World War II, when a demand-driven economy was seen as the key to our nation’s recovery and prosperity.

“Our enormously productive economy . . . demands that we make consumption our way of life, that we convert the buying and use of goods into rituals, that we seek our spiritual satisfaction, our ego satisfaction, in consumption,” retailing analyst Victor Lebow said in 1955. “We need things consumed, burned up, worn out, replaced and discarded at an ever increasing pace.”

thom browne_1
3/3/2010 2:45:54 PM

Where or what happens to these comments please do not ignore this,


thom browne_1
3/3/2010 2:32:42 PM

CONSUMERISM, Really we should ask the question do you really require the item, objects that we assume are necessary are as a result of not asking that question.One of the factors that breeds the appetite for consumerism is advertising, the inundation all around us beckoning to buy, as an example sitting here in front of a screen is companies selling their wares and services internet pages everywhere buy buy buy all forms of media entertainment information communication,selling products that we do not need. Companies sponser good causes and also condition our childrn into consumerism at the same time, subliminally selling we and especially our children will end up with the consumerist ethos. thank you by the way where does this comment go i would appreciate if you could come back to meon that question.


frantracy
3/1/2010 7:50:14 PM

I agree that we need to be able to get goods that will last. You can buy a printer almost as cheap as you can buy new ink cartridges. The newer printer's ink cartridges can't be refilled so a whole new cartridge has to be bought. I just bought a new washer and dryer. My old ones were bought in 1972 and were still working. I placed them in a rental house for my tenants. I drive a 1996 ford ranger which has 244,000 miles on it and hauls what ever I need moved. Not many people can say the same. So many people have to have a new car every couple of years and new furniture also. I think you need to repair things when they break and not buy new ones every time you turn around. Fran


melvyn magree
2/26/2010 9:35:46 PM

So-called conservatives and so-called progressives seem to deal in sweeping generalizations rather than looking at the sweeping scope of ideas and facts. "Slow Consumption" is a case of looking at one facet of American life and assuming that it holds across all of American life. (Utne Reader, March April 2010, http://www.utne.com/Environment/Slow-Consumption-Heirloom-Design.aspx) Yes, there are cheap goods that wear out and that we toss and replace. But there are also many things that last and last. Among these are the modern automobile. I am so glad that they don't build them like they used to. I bought a new 1997 F-150 truck in May 1996. In the fall of 2009 somebody asked me if it was new. Only a few times in those 13 years did I cancel a trip because of a problem. But it was undrivable only once; it had a flat tire. I traded it in this fall for an SUV and later met the buyer; he was pleased with his purchase. We have furniture that is over thirty years old. We live in a house built in 1922. We have appliances that are less than ten years old, but mostly because their energy consumption is so much less; that is, the new is truly better. Yes, we have gone through many coffee makers. But we wouldn't have to do so if we were willing to accept a little less convenience. We could buy a stovetop percolator for less than $15. If we kept it clean it would last for decades. For the rest see my blog at magree.blogspot.com