Online Comment: Likers, Haters and Manipulators at the Bottom of the Web

Explore how online comment can inform, improve, manipulate, alienate, shape and perplex us, shedding context in their passage through the Internet, prompting readers to comment in turn, “WTF?”

  • Joseph Reagle examines how comment is puzzling—short and asynchronous, these messages can be slap-dash, confusing, amusing, revealing and weird, shedding context in their passage through the Internet.
    Photo by Fotolia/dechevm

  • Cover courtesy MIT Press

Online comment can be informative or misleading, entertaining or maddening. Some comments are off-topic, or even topic-less. In Reading the Comments (MIT Press, 2015), Joseph Reagle urges us to read the conversations “on the bottom half of the Internet” to learn much about human nature and social behavior.

To find more books that pique our interest, visit the Utne Reader Bookshelf.

Comment: The Bottom Half of the Web

There’s a reason that comments are typically put on the bottom half of the Internet. —@AvoidComments (Shane Liesegang), Twitter

“Am I ugly?” This question has been asked on YouTube by dozens of young people, and hundreds of thousands of comments, ranging from supportive to insulting, have been left in response. The Web is perfect for this sort of thing, and it has been almost from the start—even if some think it alarming. Over a decade ago, some of the earliest popular exposure that the Web received was through photo-rating sites like HOTorNOT. “Am I Ugly?” videos continue this phenomenon and remain true to YouTube’s origins. YouTube was conceived, in part, as a video version of HOTorNOT. YouTube cofounder Jawed Karim was impressed with the site “because it was the first time that someone had designed a Website where anyone could upload content that everyone else could view.” But not only could people upload content: others could comment on that sophomoric content. And if the word sophomoric seems haughty, Mark Zuckerberg was a Harvard sophomore when he first launched Facemash, his hot-or-not site that used purloined student photos from dormitory directories, what Harvard calls “facebooks.”

This uploading and evaluating of content by users is now associated with various theories and buzzwords. Social media, like YouTube, are populated by user-generated content. Facebook is an example of Web 2.0 in that it harnesses the power of human networks. The online activity of masses of ordinary people might display the wisdom of the crowd or collective intelligence. Books on these topics claim that this “changes everything” and is transforming the Internet, markets, freedom, and the world. Yet I continue to be intrigued by what is happening in the margins—the seemingly modest comment. But what is comment?

As I use the term, comment is a genre of communication. In 2010, for instance, YouTube lifted its fifteen-minute limit on videos, and since then, there has been a flurry of ten-hour compilations of geeky, catchy, and annoying audio. Under a hypnotic video of Darth Vader breathing, someone commented: “What am I doing with my life?! 10 hours of breathing!” From this we can see that comment is communication, it is social, it is meant to be seen by others, and it is reactive: it follows or is in response to something and appears below a post on a blog, a book description on Amazon, or a video on YouTube. Although comment is reactive, it is not always responsive or substantively engaging. Many comments on social news sites are prefaced with the acronym tl;dr (too long; didn’t read), meaning that the commenter is reacting to a headline or blurb without having read the article. Comment is short—often as simple as the click of a button, sometimes measured in characters, but rarely more than a handful of paragraphs. And it is asynchronous, meaning that it can be made within seconds, hours, or even days of its provocation. Putting aside future transformations, comment is already present: comment has a long history (some of which I discuss briefly), and it is pervasive. Our world is permeated by comment, and we are the source of its judgment and the object of its scrutiny. There is little novelty in the form of comment itself, but its contemporary ubiquity makes it worthy of careful consideration, especially given online comment’s tarnished reputation as something best avoided.

Ashok Babar
10/25/2019 12:26:37 PM

मला वाटतंय जरा शेतकऱ्याकडे थोड लक्ष्य दिल आसते तर थोड जमलं असतं राजे. शेतकर्याला थोड्या योजना आणल्या आस्त्या तर शेतकरी सुद्धा राज्यांना विसरला नसता राजे. पाच वर्षात राज्यांनी शेतकरयांना सुखं दिल असतं तर. किंव्हा त्यांनी इतक्या मेहनितिनी पिकवलेल होत त्याला योग्य भाव दिला असता तर . शेतकरी बांधव विसरला नसता राजे. कारण आपण त्यांना यामुळेच निवडून देत असतो. उगाचच का शेतकरयांना वाटण छत्रपतींचा पराभव करायचा. अरे ते राजे आहेत त्यांनी तर किती सुविधा करून द्यायला पाहिजेत. आपल्या सारख्या मावळ्याने हे त्यांना सांगायची गरज नाही. आपला बाप इतका पावसाळ्यात. उन्हाळ्यात. हिवाळ्यात. राब राब राबतो आणि त्याला साधं राहायला चांगलं घर नाही. आणि का करतो आपला बाप आत्महत्या करायचा विचार. हे तुम्हाला कळायला पाहिजे. त्याला दोन वेळेस पोठभर जेवण नाही. अरे काय केले म्हणावा. राजेंना. कोणत्या सणाला सन नाही त्याला. पहिल्या राज्याचा इतिहास काय या राजेंचा इतिहास काय. आपल्याला का वाटण उघाच छत्रपतींचा पराभव करायला. आता दुसऱ्या जिल्ह्यातल्या शेतकर्यांचा विचार सोडा. त्यांच्याच गावातल्या किंवा जिल्ह्यातल्याचा विचार करा. आहे का शेतकरी सुखी. सांगा म्हणावं. आता किती घरं भरायचे. थोड असतय. असं नसते राजे. जाऊद्या या वेळेस बघतो हे नवीन आलेले खासदार काम करतात का. केले तर छानच आहे. नाहीतर आहेत पुन्हा तुम्ही राजे. जे विचार होते ते मांडले धन्यवाद...

Facebook Instagram Twitter