Reporters Under the Microscope

| May-June 2008

For those of us who’ve been blinded by science—or blindsided by lousy reporting on technological and environmental issues—a new online tool helps identify the most spot-on sources. At the Observatory (, launched in January by the intrepid media watchdogs at the Columbia Journalism Review, writers cast a skeptical glance at science journalism, scrutinizing everything from climate-change coverage to the heralding of pseudoscientific “trends.” In February, the site called out major media outlets, including CNN and the New York Times, for scientifically unsound reports on neuroimaging technology that could supposedly predict voters’ preferences. Don’t buy into this “neuropunditry,” the Observatory warned, using a term coined by Slate’s Daniel Engber, and beware of other election-season “techno infatuation.”

Pay Now Save $5!

Utne Summer 2016Want to gain a fresh perspective? Read stories that matter? Feel optimistic about the future? It's all here! Utne Reader offers provocative writing from diverse perspectives, insightful analysis of art and media, down-to-earth news and in-depth coverage of eye-opening issues that affect your life.

Save Even More Money By Paying NOW!

Pay now with a credit card and take advantage of our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You save an additional $5 and get 4 issues of Utne Reader for only $40.00 (USA only).

Or Bill Me Later and pay just $45 for 4 issues of Utne Reader!

Facebook Instagram Twitter