Thou Shalt Not Kill. Unless . . .

A Texas native stares down his state’s execution machine, one day at a time


| November-December 2010


A good friend told me something startling. She said that, barring some unforeseen event, a good friend of hers was going to be poisoned to death by the state of Texas.

Her friend’s name was David Lee Powell, and David was a convicted criminal who was sentenced to death for the vicious, evil murder of a police officer named Ralph Ablanedo.

I recognize that David Lee Powell’s crime was heinous. And yet I don’t believe he was a heinous man. I don’t believe the state had the right to kill him. I also doubt, very much, that any of this—the shooting of a police officer or the poisoning of a convicted murderer—would have registered as more than a passing blip on the radar screen of my mind if I hadn’t been personally affected, albeit in an extremely indirect manner, by this sorrowful series of events.

But because I was personally affected, because I was challenged by conversations I had with my friend—about David Powell and the death penalty, about the state’s right to kill American citizens, and about my own obliviousness to political issues that don’t directly affect me—I volunteered to write a series of posts for the Texas Observer’s website. Excerpts from some of them follow.

During the two weeks I wrote these posts, which took the form of a daily countdown to David’s death, I found myself profoundly confronted by the experience.

Twelve Days Left to Live
June 3, 2010
            

rodeen
11/12/2010 8:40:46 AM

Thanks for sharing as always Occum. As usual I have something I would like to add. These "Scholars" debating the evolution of morality were obviously atheist? Agnostic? Or possibly Universalist? Either or I find the way the debate was framed silly. Morality never changes. If for example the death penalty is wrong it will be wrong 100 years from now even if 99% of the population supports it. The way we view morality changes we may increase one dial like sex (by this I mean we place a greater value on sexual morality) for example and decrease another like violence (violence is more tolerated). There is a standard and it does not evolve we all know that there is a standard because we are born with a desire to pursue the "Right" or "Moral" thing to do even if we do not do it, it is our pursuit that proves the point not our ability to achieve.


Occum
11/11/2010 3:28:50 PM

I listened to a fascinating radio discussion between four scholars regarding the evolution of morality. One point brought about was the premise that we are all imbalanced in some fashion and it is just a matter of invoking that defect in the correct time and place. Understanding that premise, they concurred would make us all a little more compassionate. However, they also agreed that if they found someone sitting in their car when they left a different personal view may be had. These are difficult decisions.


Ann Frye
11/10/2010 9:59:07 AM

Thought provoking. As a tax-paying citizen of a state (not Texas) and of the United States, I also have complicity in this state run death machine. And it sickens me.







Pay Now Save $5!

Utne Summer 2016Want to gain a fresh perspective? Read stories that matter? Feel optimistic about the future? It's all here! Utne Reader offers provocative writing from diverse perspectives, insightful analysis of art and media, down-to-earth news and in-depth coverage of eye-opening issues that affect your life.

Save Even More Money By Paying NOW!

Pay now with a credit card and take advantage of our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You save an additional $5 and get 4 issues of Utne Reader for only $31.00 (USA only).

Or Bill Me Later and pay just $36 for 4 issues of Utne Reader!




Facebook Instagram Twitter flipboard


Copyright 2018, All Rights Reserved
Ogden Publications, Inc., 1503 SW 42nd St., Topeka, Kansas 66609-1265