Herman Daly

Utne Reader visionary [Originally published as Herman Daly in the January-February 1995 issue of Utne Reader]


| January/February 1995



“I'm no genius,” says economist Herman Daly, “and others can outwork me. What I do is ask the naive, honest questions, and then Im not satisfied until I get the answers.” 

This modest self-assessment aside, many who know his work are convinced that Dalys way of asking naive, honest questionsin four books and more than one hundred articlesamounts to a kind of reverse Copernican revolution in economicsa revolution that, to quote one reviewer of Dalys For the Common Good (1989, written with John B. Cobb Jr.), “[puts] the earth and its inhabitants back at the center of the economic universe.” 

A former professor at Louisiana State University, a six-year employee of the World Bank (with which he parted more or less amicably“I was tired of the pomposity,” he says), and currently a research scholar at the University of Maryland, the 56-year-old Daly brings the careful, fluent lucidity of an experienced teacher to his exposition of what's wrong with what some have called “the dismal science.” Whats wrong are some of the most basic assumptions of economics. 

“For the last two hundred years,” he says, “the dominant goal has been to make economies grow. Weve finessed everything else, including justice, telling ourselves that well just grow more and then therell be more justice. But we are on a collision course with biophysical reality.” 

In Dalys neat and compelling formulation, ozone depletion, the death of fish stocks, runaway population growththe whole congeries of environmental degradationsare showing economic conventional wisdom up as self-contradictory: “We say we need to clean up the environment; to clean up the environment we need to be richer. But maybe getting richer is actually making us poorer.” The reason? The world economy is far larger with respect to the biosphere than it was during the age of the classical economists. 

“The old textbooks saw an economy as a circular flow of value from households to firms back to households, via production and consumption,” he explains. “They abstracted out the environment completely, and that wasnt stupid at a time when economies were small compared to ecosystems. But now, with growth having gone on for so long, were actually spending our natural capital. Its reached an insane point.”