Internet Extremists and the Politics of Filtering


| 1/6/2008 12:33:09 PM


Tags: Internet, Extremism, enclave, Cass, Sunstein, Global Warming, Liberal, Conservative, Politics,

With so much information available on the internet, many people stick to websites they agree with. Liberals tend to read liberal blogs, and conservatives read conservative ones. Techies interact with other techies, and artists with other artists. If you want to see the new Michael Moore movie, Amazon.com or Netflix can suggest dozens of other anti-war, anti-corporate films. People can spend a lifetime surfing the web, and never have to confront a dissenting point of view.

This kind of filtering and self-selecting isn’t new, but it’s getting more extreme. “As a result of the Internet,” University of Chicago professor Cass R. Sunstein writes for the Chronicle of Higher Education, “we live increasingly in an era of enclaves and niches — much of it voluntary, much of it produced by those who think they know, and often do know, what we're likely to like.” These niches reinforce similar points of view, creating what Sunstein calls “enclave extremism.”

Extremism isn’t always a bad thing, according to Sunstein. Abolitionists and civil-rights activists were extremists in their time. Problems arise when the reinforced point of view is wrong. Global-warming deniers can find plenty of “evidence” on the internet that environmentalism is a fraud. Sunstein writes that a lack of dissent can also lead to “mutual suspicion, unjustified rage, and social fragmentation” if left unchecked.

Bennett Gordon

ej o'malley
1/11/2008 3:18:19 AM

Arn't there any sites where people with different views can dialog, perhaps with a moderator to keep things civil? I have been looking for such a site. I want to hear all sides of many issues but I don't want insults and name-calling. Maybe someone could start such a site. It might be the NEXT BIG THING.


bennett
1/9/2008 10:01:06 AM

I can see Filtered In Nashville’s point. We all need filters. There’s just too much information out there not to have filters. Problems arise when people filter out legitimate points of view from people who disagree. I think it was George Patton who said, “If everybody's thinking alike, somebody isn't thinking.” http://utne.com/daily.aspx


harold w. ard_3
1/8/2008 11:37:10 AM

Reckon, we could put "Drug Prohibition", better know as, "War On Drugs" in the "lack of dissent" category. http://weird-harolds.com


filtered in nashville
1/8/2008 11:29:52 AM

Offline, when it comes to having a conversation with someone of a different viewpoint, we choose who that person will be. If we know a person to be an idiot or a thug, if we don't like idiots and thugs, we don't associate with them. As there is no way for the average person to control who is and who is not allowed to post on a message board, it makes sense to give the user such filters they need to avoid having their time wasted by disruptors and others with more time than good conversation.