LEED, Not So Clear-Cut

Some argue that the big business of sustainable design is a fraud
by Staff, Utne Reader
January-February 2012
Add to My MSN

Image by Flickr user: D H Wright / Creative Commons


Content Tools

Related Content

My Wind Turbine’s Bigger Than Yours

Wind turbines don’t just collect energy. They collect attention...

America’s Paper Trail

Paper Elephant outlines how prevalent paper is in our daily lives and how we can eliminate our obsce...

Lessons from Farmers and Architects

An architect praises the lousy economy, comparing the loss of business to a farmer allowing a field ...

Dwell Magazine Likes Wood Slats

If you've ever thumbed through a copy of Dwell magazine, you'll probably get a giggle out of this......

LEED-certified architecture was conceived by a nonprofit to save energy on heating and cooling, but it also makes for big business. According to the watchdogs at Mother Jones (Sept.-Oct. 2011), an office building certified for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design costs $171 more to build per square foot than a typical structure—and the standards may be better at generating publicity than at encouraging truly cost-effective, environmentally friendly energy. At least that’s the contention of energy consultant Henry Gifford, who has filed a series of lawsuits against the U.S. Green Building Council, which developed the internationally recognized rating system.

Gifford argues that showy details like solar panels are worthless unless other fundamental design principles are followed (improving boiler room piping, for instance, or adding insulation). “Going to so much trouble and expense to end up with buildings that use more energy than comparable buildings is not only a tragedy,” says Gifford, “it is also a fraud.”

The building council is also under attack from conservationists protesting a proposed change to LEED standards pertaining to timber, reports Grist (Oct. 10, 2011). According to Todd Paglia, executive director of the nonprofit Forest Ethics, the new rules would allow developers to use wood “from some of the worst clear-cuts in North America” and still get their houses certified. The council defends itself, saying that LEED certification is based on a point system, which rewards architects for making a certain number of sustainable decisions. In other words, low-flush toilets or solar lighting could compensate for clear-cut wood. A policy that Gifford would argue proves his point.

Cover-169-thumb.jpgHave something to say? Send a letter to editor@utne.com. This article first appeared in the January-February 2012 issue of Utne Reader.








Post a comment below.

 

CHRISTOPHER JONES
2/22/2012 8:12:42 PM
LEED is a good idea. I attempted to get a LEED certification on a remodel home project, only to find that it requires that a person retain certain LEED contractors. A person could qualify for a LEED certificate if they accounted for all material used then paid for an inspection. I chose the later, It cost more for some item but in all it was about the same costs. It did take more time on my part but in the end, it was the right thing to do.








Pay Now & Save $5!
First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Want to gain a fresh perspective? Read stories that matter? Feel optimistic about the future? It's all here! Utne Reader offers provocative writing from diverse perspectives, insightful analysis of art and media, down-to-earth news and in-depth coverage of eye-opening issues that affect your life.

Save Even More Money By Paying NOW!

Pay now with a credit card and take advantage of our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You save an additional $5 and get 4 issues of Utne Reader for only $31.00 (USA only).

Or Bill Me Later and pay just $36 for 4 issues of Utne Reader!