American Jerk

Be Civil, or I’ll Beat You to a Pulp

| July-August 2009

It was the most civil of times, it was the least civil of times, it was the age of politeness, it was the age of boorishness, it was the epoch of concern, it was the epoch of who cares, it was the season of hybrid, it was the season of Hummer, it was the spring of Obama, it was the winter of hate speech . . .

With apologies to Mr. Dickens (or not: screw him), we have arrived at simultaneously the most and least civil moment in U.S. history. A moment when a roomful of even relatively evolved people will react with discomfort to an off-color joke about people of color—and when those same people have no compunction whatsoever about loudly ignoring one another as they blather into their cell phones.

We have never been more concerned about the feelings of minority groups, the disabled, and the disadvantaged. Yet we have never been less concerned about the feelings of anyone with whom we share the road, the Internet, or the movie theater.

Political correctness holds such sway that holidays go unnamed for fear of insulting or excluding someone. Schools won’t let teachers use red pens to correct papers, because little Ethan’s or Emily’s self-esteem might be bruised. No one is “poor,” but many are “socioeconomically disadvantaged.” Civility and thoughtfulness in speech have never been so complete or so codified.

All of which is well intentioned and mostly a wonderful thing. I’m all for being polite and caring and Golden Rule–ish. Sadly, like a lovely field of wildflowers—which in reality is filled with bloodsucking ticks and noxious pollen—we live oh-so-politely in what must certainly be the rudest era in recorded history. Maybe even prehistory.

Neanderthals were probably nicer to each other than we are.

9/17/2015 4:24:35 PM

[Pardon my grammar structure] Though we try to be as polite and considerate of others, we often step back and think before we talk [which is not a bad thing]. We try to act and be as civilized as possible by holding off our words or actions because we are scared to be labeled or accused of labeling somebody else. Today's society has come a long way, or so we have thought. We generalized terms and names to suit everybody's needs and beliefs and called it politically correct. But does anybody shows genuine care? My take on this is that I think, we lack something very important. What we really need is acceptance. If we all try to respect each others' differences and embrace each others' similarities, then maybe, we can see the changes and can start calling this civilized era, as "the most civil of times". :-)

3/1/2014 7:17:06 AM

KHYF. I wanted to add a cute acronym for being sorry, but, all I could find is the snarky SCNR (sorry could not resist). Should have predicted that.

Robert Bernstein
7/13/2009 11:48:04 PM

I enjoyed the "Great Civility War" article by Todd Schwartz, reprinted in Utne Reader as "American Jerk". One thing I am not so sure about: That we are more uncivil than humans past. I actually have observed that there is a constancy of inconsiderate behavior. Remember when digital watches first came along? How they would beep every hour and alarms would go off at all sorts of annoying moments? How at the start of a public event, people would be reminded please to turn off their digital watch chimes and alarms? When was the last time you heard a digital watch chime or alarm at a public event? The cynic might say they couldn't hear them because of all of the cell phone ring tones and cell phone yakking. But that is my point: No sooner did one annoyance go away, then we created another to take its place. In California, a motorist can sit at a green traffic signal all day long and no one would dare to even tap their horn to remind them to go. Yet, motorists think nothing of blasting their horn every single time they enter and exit their vehicles for reasons that defy all logic. As one who is usually on foot or on my bicycle at such moments, the annoyance is not trivial. Again, we have a new annoyance that replaced a previous annoyance. The wonder is not how people keep coming up with new annoyances. The real wonder is how the amount of annoyances stay so constant despite all of the new annoyances. If we can get rid of the old ones each time we create a new one, why not do the former and just stop doing the latter?