Writers Sound Off on Most-Hated Journalistic Clichés

By By miranda Trimmier 
Published on January 5, 2009

The National Conference of Editorial Writers recently released a list of their most-hated journalistic clichés, the mushy euphemisms and trendy phrases that they think ought to be banned. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch excerpted the survey, along with some of the editorialists’ biting commentary:

  • Issues and challenges: “No one has problems any more. We have ‘issues.’ Likewise, we have ‘challenges.’…Why isn’t that a ‘problem’?”
  • Faith-based: “Almost 100 percent of the time this phrase is used, the user means ‘religious,’ and they should just suck it up and use the real term.”
  • Declined comment: “We’re not inviting people to tea parties here. We’re asking questions….They didn’t ‘decline comment.’ They ‘would not comment.'”
  • Closure: “An appalling word that crept out from the woodwork of psychobabble where it squats, poisoning the language, above all in journalism.”

 (Thanks, Get Religion.)

UTNE
UTNE
In-depth coverage of eye-opening issues that affect your life.