The Union of Science and Spirituality

Science and spirituality need one another to flourish—one alone is never enough.

Photo by Getty Images/grandeduc.

In order to embody the philosophy of elegant simplicity, we need to address the relationship between science and spirituality. Some people think that science and spirituality are polar opposites, but are they? Science is about things which can be measured, and spirituality is about things which cannot be measured. In life, both of these are integrated together. Look at our bodies. We can measure the weight, length, width, structure, and anatomy of the body. But we also have intelligence. How do we measure intelligence? We can do some IQ tests, but we can never really measure how much intelligence we have. Then we have feelings, like love for our friends and family. Can we measure love? So spirituality is about what cannot be measured. We need to measure what can be measured, but we also need to accept the truth that there are dimensions of life which cannot be measured.

There are scientific theories such as complexity, chaos, Gaia and evolution which come close to spirituality. Quantum physics in particular bridges the gap between meaning and measurement. When you put meaning into quantity, quantity becomes quantum. At quantum level, all separations end. We are all related and connected at the energy level. Thus the meaning of existence is unmanifest and invisible and therefore spiritual. Some of my scientist friends believe that consciousness is close to quantum physics because at the level of quantum mechanics all manifestation is potential. The meaning of consciousness is also the same; there is an unmanifest potential before reality manifests. In the spiritual terminology, we call it consciousness, in scientific terminology, we call it quantum mechanics.

We can measure matter, but we cannot measure meaning. When I write an article, I can say it is eight hundred words and will fit on one page. I can count the number of words, and I can measure how much space it will take, but the meaning of the words and the quality of the writing cannot be measured. I can feel the meaning and sense it, but I cannot measure it. Words have a physical reality, but their meaning is metaphysical. The law has two aspects: the letter of the law and the spirit of the law. Everything has a physical reality and a metaphysical reality. We have the human body and the human spirit. We need matter and we need spirit. They form one unified reality. One cannot exist without the other. There is no separation or dualism between the physical and the metaphysical or between the material and the spiritual.

Science gives us rational, logical, empirical, measurable, and replicable tools and technologies which we need to function well in life. Spirituality gives us love, compassion, generosity, and a sense of mutuality. We need these too.

Without the spiritual dimension of values, vision, ethics, and aesthetics, science can lead us astray. When there are no values to guide it, science ends up producing nuclear weapons. If spirituality guided the actions of scientists, then they would think ten times before inventing weapons of war and other tools of destruction. Why do we have global warming? Because scientists have been working in the interests of the commercial and industrial establishments, without the guidance of spiritual values; that is why their scientific and technological innovations have led to planetary crises such as climate change.

12/20/2019 7:07:44 PM

Namaste Satish and thank you for publishing this extract from your book, I truly enjoyed although I noticed it took three pages to pretty much repeat the same concept many times over. That aside, I completely agree with your vision of communion between spirituality and science, as His Holiness the Dalai Lama teaches us by showing his behavior as usual. I wish to put forth a word of caution for when you cluster different belief systems under the same umbrella. Please refer to the following paragraph "People of blind faith don't see or believe in anything other than what is in their holy book. They take every word in the Bible or the Koran, the Torah or the Gita as the word of God." By adding the Gita you are adding Buddhism to that group of diverse traditions. There could be no more erroneous mention, which appears to be borne of ignorance, taken as in lack of knowledge and peeled from the negative connotations that Western thought adds to the word. To start with, Buddhism is not a monotheistic philosophy like the Christian as an example. In Buddhism there is a great leader, Siddhartha Gautama who was not a God, but a prince who decided to leave his sensuous, luxurious life in the palace, under the tight protection of his father, the King, and live in the jungle, even surviving from just one grain of rice a day for a while, because he wanted to explore the causes of suffering and find the way to end it, not for himself, but for all sentient beings and humans in particular. He was not declared the leader of Buddhism by an election or the edict of a monarch, we can say it was "by popular vote" to use a term current with the times. People realized, time over, that his suggestions and recommendations were always leading to a better quality of life. Word of mouth did the rest. We can cement this style by showing the key difference between the Catholic Ten Commandments and the Buddha's Eightfold Path, their impact on humans and consequences after death. The Ten Commandments are iron-clad rules, like the Laws of God, planted on the shoulder of every human being, upon which, you will eventually be "judged", and consigned to spending infinity either burning in hell or enjoying the good life in heaven. The Eight propositions the Buddha presents in the Noble Eightfold Path are NOT rules rather good-hearted recommendations to achieve a pleasant life now, while you are alive. The Buddha does not judge you, either as a human being or a corpse. You castigate yourself by not picking up on his suggestions because your life will show you plenty of suffering. In just one summarizing sentence we could say that Catholic is a religion where Buddhism is a "way of life". The difference is immense. One is a theology the other a philosophy. So, as I don't get deeply involved in discussions about the difference between the New and the Old Testament, out of respect, non much for the tradition but for my ignorance of the subject, I would suggest you revisit your approach in your future writings. Allow me to conclude that it is not my intention to grade one spiritual belief versus the next one, nor to convert you to Buddhism. I personally believe that anything that stimulates a human being to lift his chin and look up at the sky for answers to his most critical questions, is definitely worth pursuing, no matter the label, color or media utilized to promote it. Spirituality is wonderful so let's spread it worldwide as you did in your article for which I humbly offer you my gratitude. Sincerely and honestly, Bodhivata

Facebook Instagram Twitter