What’s Love Got To Do With It?
Are arranged marriages healthier than romantic attraction?
May / June 2003
By Anjula Razdan, Utne magazine
One of the greatest pleasures of my teen years was sitting down with a bag of cinnamon Red Hots and a new LaVyrle Spencer romance, immersing myself in another tale of star-crossed lovers drawn together by the heart’s mysterious alchemy. My mother didn’t get it. “Why are you reading that?” she would ask, her voice tinged with both amusement and horror. Everything in her background told her that romance was a waste of time.
RELATED CONTENT
After years of Taliban oppression, Afghan women finally have a fighting chance at equal rights, tha...
Polygamy may be a third-degree felony in Utah, but that didn't stop Anne Wilde, Marianne Watson and...
Contribute your story to Utne Reader!...
Heartland Utne Reader March / April 2007 Nina Utne Utne Reader My stepson, Leif, and his Swedish wi...
Soul Mate Mania November December 2004 By Craig Cox Heightened expectations of love and intimacy h...
Born and raised in Illinois by parents who emigrated from India 35 years ago, I am the product of an arranged marriage, and yet I grew up under the spell of Western romantic love—first comes love, then comes marriage—which both puzzled and dismayed my parents. Their relationship was set up over tea and samosas by their grandfathers, and they were already engaged when they went on their first date, a chaperoned trip to the movies. My mom and dad still barely knew each other on their wedding day—and they certainly hadn’t fallen in love. Yet both were confident that their shared values, beliefs, and family background would form a strong bond that, over time, would develop into love.
“But, what could they possibly know of real love?” I would ask myself petulantly after each standoff with my parents over whether or not I could date in high school (I couldn’t) and whether I would allow them to arrange my marriage (I wouldn’t). The very idea of an arranged marriage offended my ideas of both love and liberty—to me, the act of choosing whom to love represented the very essence of freedom. To take away that choice seemed like an attack not just on my autonomy as a person, but on democracy itself.
And, yet, even in the supposedly liberated West, the notion of choosing your mate is a relatively recent one. Until the 19th century, writes historian E.J. Graff in What Is Marriage For?: The Strange Social History of Our Most Intimate Institution (Beacon Press, 1999), arranged marriages were quite common in Europe as a way of forging alliances, ensuring inheritances, and stitching together the social, political, and religious needs of a community. Love had nothing to do with it.
Fast forward a couple hundred years to 21st-century America, and you see a modern, progressive society where people are free to choose their mates, for the most part, based on love instead of social or economic gain. But for many people, a quiet voice from within wonders: Are we really better off? Who hasn’t at some point in their life—at the end of an ill-fated relationship or midway through dinner with the third “date-from-hell” this month—longed for a matchmaker to find the right partner? No hassles. No effort. No personal ads or blind dates.
Page: 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Next >>