Hooked on Nollywood
Nigeria's film industry charts its own strange course
Jonathan Kiefer Maisonneuve
Utne Reader January / February 2007
Nigeria's film industry, or Nollywood, as it's been dubbed, is
the third most prolific in the world, behind the United States'
Hollywood and India's Bollywood. For a nation seven years into
democracy, recovering from corrupt military rule and a ruined
economy, being third at most anything is not trivial. Since its
rebirth in the early 1990s, the industry has generated $200 million
in revenue, and, with 350,000 people employed, it generates more
jobs than any other industry in Nigeria-and possibly all of
Africa.
RELATED CONTENT
But what's really remarkable is that, until Nollywood, African
filmmaking had been an overwhelmingly colonial enterprise,
practiced by artists trained in Europe and subsidized by European
capital to make sophisticated films, on celluloid, aimed at
non-African audiences. By contrast, many Nollywood movies are made
by Nigerians who have little formal training, with small budgets;
they're shot on, and often go directly to, video; and their stories
typically consist of homegrown pop-culture pulp. The enormity of
the Nollywood phenomenon rattles our know-it-all pronouncements
about cultural imperialism: Are we to congratulate or rue its
market-driven ascendancy? Are we to consider it the truest index of
contemporary Nigerian culture?
Better minds than mine can figure all of that out. While they
do, I'll be busy with tonight's triple feature: He Goat,
Smile of Destruction, and Not with My
Daughter.
The Nollywood industry sprouted in an era of severe economic
depression, with no help from the corrupt syndicates that
controlled the nation's few movie houses, nor from the stingy
Nigerian Television Authority. It emerged 'at a time when Nigeria
had given up on [broadcast] television,' says Moradewun Adejunmobi,
a Nigerian American and a professor at the University of California
in Davis. 'Some people came from that industry, in which they felt
like they weren't properly paid.' From there, it was home video and
direct marketing to the rescue.
One problem with a lot of Nollywood movies is how frequently
they suck. It doesn't take a film critic to recognize this. Many
people liken them to B movies, but some could count as C's and D's.
Bad acting and bad sound often render the dialogue unintelligible.
Directing tends to consist of making sure the camera is on.
Dramatization is poor and the subtext nonexistent. Sets look
conspicuously bare and poorly lit. Nothing makes much sense.
The reason I can render such sweeping judgments about Nollywood
movies is that I can't stop watching them. The industry can go
right ahead and produce 50 a week, because, if I'm not careful, I
can watch 50 a week. For dedicated procrastination, even pointless
websites have nothing on Nollywood.