A Better Way to Cross the Road

Man-made wildlife crossings save lives and money
by Staff, Utne Reader
July-August 2011
Add to My MSN

Courtesy of ARC Competition and HNTb / www.arc-competition.com


Content Tools

Related Content

Crossing the Atlantic in a Pedal-Powered Sub

Ted Ciamillo’s devised a flashy way to draw attention to the pedal-powered submarine he invented: La...

The Undiagnosed Disease Program: The Real House M.D.

Inside the Undiagnosed Disease Program, the National Institute of Health's real-life version of "Hou...

Stimulus Bill Pumps Almost a Billion Into Parks

Call it scenery stimulus. America’s national parks got more than $900 million in funding in the rece...

Unidentified Feathered Objects

The great spring bird migration is under way, and the modern birdwatcher can track this spectacular ...

The costs of getting around keep rising—and we’re not just talking about gas. Take the materials required to build highway overpasses: Costs for cast-in-place concrete and steel have tripled in the past 12 years. As a result, wildlife crossings are viewed as luxury items, says Tony Clevenger, a wildlife ecologist with the Western Transportation Institute (WTI) at Montana State University. As Landscape Architecture (March 2011) reports, though, when animals can’t cross the road to reach their natural habitats, we all end up paying.  

According to the Insurance Information Institute, deer collisions with vehicles account for 1.6 million crashes, about 200 human deaths, and more than $4.6 billion in medical costs and car repairs every year. Millions of other animals are also killed by drivers, and that’s taking a toll on species populations.  

When Clevenger studied Canada’s Banff National Park, he found that its 22 underpasses and two overpasses that serve as wildlife crossings have reduced animal fatalities by 80 percent. Data like this prompted WTI and the Woodcock Foundation of New York City to sponsor the first ARC International Wildlife Crossing Infrastructure Design Competition in 2009. The organizers, who wanted to raise the profile of wildlife crossings, also hoped to encourage design that’s both affordable and ecologically minded.  

Currently, most crossings feature a “green toupee” of soil and plants slapped on top of concrete, points out ecologist and planner Nina-Marie Lister, who served as a contest consultant. “Now we want to show what the possibilities are,” she says.  

Engineering firm HNTB and landscape architects Michael Van Valkenburgh Associates with Applied Ecological Services won the first contest for their design of a crossing near Vail, Colorado, that will feature a wildlife overpass, understory planting, selective thinning of the tree canopy, controlled burns, fencing, and adaptable precast concrete modules, which lower future design costs. The design also aims to extend habitat corridors and encourage wildlife movement.  

And that, says the deer that just dodged a pair of headlights, is priceless.

cover-166-thumbnailHave something to say? Send a letter to editor@utne.com. This article first appeared in the July-August 2011 issue of Utne Reader








Post a comment below.

 








Pay Now & Save $5!
First Name: *
Last Name: *
Address: *
City: *
State/Province: *
Zip/Postal Code:*
Country:
Email:*
(* indicates a required item)
Canadian subs: 1 year, (includes postage & GST). Foreign subs: 1 year, . U.S. funds.
Canadian Subscribers - Click Here
Non US and Canadian Subscribers - Click Here

Want to gain a fresh perspective? Read stories that matter? Feel optimistic about the future? It's all here! Utne Reader offers provocative writing from diverse perspectives, insightful analysis of art and media, down-to-earth news and in-depth coverage of eye-opening issues that affect your life.

Save Even More Money By Paying NOW!

Pay now with a credit card and take advantage of our earth-friendly automatic renewal savings plan. You save an additional $5 and get 4 issues of Utne Reader for only $31.00 (USA only).

Or Bill Me Later and pay just $36 for 4 issues of Utne Reader!